Yeah – I got 20 inches of global warming in my yard. Brrrr.

It’s not just a “cold snap” – several record cold winters in a row in the northern hemisphere now while global fossil fuel consumption rises almost exponentially as the Asian middle class booms.

Have you been taking these people seriously?!!!!

Seems He Does Now Care If  He’s “Only A One Term President”.

He has followed the lead of the Aussie Greens and quietly dropped “Climate” from the agenda – for the election at least.

The Republicans have a name for their replacement to the EPA – the ESA – Environment Solutions Agency!

Seems americans are not happy to pay soaring energy bills or lose their jobs to China – even to “save the planet” – Who’ve thunk it?

This WaPo Greenie laments.

WASHINGTON POST.
Obama administration slows environmental rules as it weighs political cost
By Juliet Eilperin,
Published: February 13
http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=5e8d99c7d7f8dbebb588b95bf9f48842

” …White House spokesman Clark Stevens wrote in an e-mail that the administration would seek to balance economic and environmental considerations when deciding what regulations to issue in the coming year…. “

It is highly amusing to watch Kevin 07 furiously manipulating the Mass Media, which, of course, is no longer the mass media.

NOBODY CARES, nobody is going to change their vote.

If she’s smart Julia will let him win, so he can loose, and she can stage a comeback after the massive election loss!

Re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic is a much laboured, but in this case, truly apt metaphor.

When was the last time you saw Bob Brown or Christine Milne actively peddling “Climate Change”? – The silence is deafening – a 5% reduction is nowhere near what they were demanding!

Australians just grind their teeth together in anger when they open their electricity bill and get told what their “Greenhouse Emissions” were – as if they should feel guilty and repent their sins and pay more and more to “save the planet” from their evil consumption – when Bob Brown and the Greens just blithely dropped the whole thing and moved on to other, more popular, issues.

SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
Australia ratifies Kyoto Protocol
December 3, 2007
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/rudd-signs-kyoto-deal/2007/12/03/1196530553203.html

“Australia has ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd signed the instrument of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol in his first act after being sworn in this morning…. “

” …He said the Federal Government would do everything in its power to help Australia meet its Kyoto obligations, including setting a target to reduce emissions by 60 per cent on 2000 levels by 2050. It also would establish a national emissions trading scheme by 2010 and set a 20 per cent target for renewable energy by 2020. “I will also lead the Australian delegation at the opening of the high level segment of the United Nations conference on climate change in Bali next week,” Mr Rudd said.  The Bali conference, which opened today, will set out a road map for the next round of action against climate change, starting when the current Kyoto targets expire in 2012…. “

SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
Climate change conference opens in Bali
December 3, 2007
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/climate-change-conference-opens-in-bali/2007/12/03/1196530538611.html

” …Nothing has ever been attempted on such a grand scale in the history of environmental policy and even diplomacy itself, say delegates girding themselves for the Bali marathon. “If you look at what the Bali negotiating roadmap is all about, it’s less to do with the environment and more to do with reshaping the world’s economy over the next few decades,” a European diplomat said…. “

” …Ahead of the Bali meeting, the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that damage to Earth’s weather systems this century would doom poor countries to worse hunger, water stress and damage from violent storms. Nearly a third of plant and animal species could be wiped out. Last Tuesday, the UN Development Program said warming was likely to breach 4 degrees and described the fate of vulnerable countries as being at a “tipping point”…. “

POSTCRIPT – Actually this was a positioning excercise that went horribly wrong. Kevin 07 just wanted to position himself as the heir apparent and shot himself in the foot.
What sophisticated media we have – NOT!
None of them saw that he had less than 30 votes, just as none of them ever studied Global Warming seriously.

2/10/12:
Rick Santorum told a cheering crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington DC that climate change is a leftist scientific conspiracy to destroy America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr14jb-jds4&feature=player_embedded

“….your, your proper understanding and belief that we are stewards of this earth and that we have a responsibility to hand off a, a beautiful Earth to the next generation – and so they used that…  …to try to, scare you into supporting radical ideas on the environment… they tried it with this…  ….politisization of science called man-made global warming…”

Whoops.

These are not equivocal predictions – no “may” or “could” – we were told the aussie drought was Climate Change and that it was here to stay.

In Queensland we held onto the floodwaters to long causing the Brisbane floods and built a ridiculous desalination plant.

From Canberra we got a ridiculous Carbon Tax which achieves absolutely nothing and gets worse and worse as the world fails to warm and we narrowly avoided unnecessarily buying up huge amounts of water, destroying agriculture, in a river system that has now flooded 2 years in a row.

AUS CHANNEL TEN
Bolt Report
Andrew Bolt
http://ten.com.au/boltreport.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X4hMzNFZ1U

“even the rain that falls, isn’t actually going to fill our dams and our river systems” - DURH!!!

“so there is a very, very, sound body of evidence that indicates that Climate Change is and will have an impact on rainfall in the Murray Darling Basin and in southern Australia” – - “see evidence is very clear that we need to prepare for a future where we are likely to see less rain and we have to invest now to prepare for that future”.

FORBES MAGAZINE
Warren Meyer, Contributor
Understanding the Global Warming Debate
2/09/2012 @ 9:56AM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/warrenmeyer/2012/02/09/understanding-the-global-warming-debate/

“ …It turns out that the propositions that are “settled” and the propositions to which some like me are skeptical are NOT the same propositions.  Understanding that mismatch will help explain a lot of the climate debate…. “

” …While some of the talk-show-type skeptics have tried to dispute this greenhouse theory, most of what I call the science-based skeptics do not, and accept a number circa 1C for the direct warming effect of a doubling of CO2.

So what’s the problem?  Why the debate?  Isn’t this admission a “game over” for the skeptics?  Actually, no.  To understand this, let us do a bit of extrapolation.  Current CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere today are around 390ppm, or about 0.039%.    But even if we were to hit a relatively pessimistic level of 800ppm by the end of the century, this would, by the numbers above, imply a warming of about one degree.  While potentially undesirable, a degree of warming is hardly catastrophic.   The catastrophe comes from the second chained theory…. “

(Then there’s the simple fact that the biosphere is hungry for the gas and soaks it up greedily in plant growth.)

If your eyes glaze over when presented with a global Temperature Anomoly Graph (post below), here is an article on “Anomolies”. (takes out the altitude and latitude factors – also the variation in global temperature is so trivial that a full sized graph would look like a flat line!)

WUWT
How reliable are global temperature “anomalies” ?
Posted on February 7, 2012
by Anthony Watts
Guest post by Clive Best
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/07/how-reliable-are-global-temperature-anomalies/

NO TRICKS ZONE
Body Blow To German Global Warming Movement!
Major Media Outlets Unload On “CO2 Lies!”
By P Gosselin 6.
Februar 2012
http://notrickszone.com/2012/02/06/body-blow-to-german-global-warming-movement-major-media-outlets-unload-on-co2-lies/

“ …This is huge. More than I ever could have possibly imagined. And more is coming in the days ahead! The Bild piece was just the first of a series.
Mark this as the date that Germany’s global warming movement took a massive body blow.
Today, not one, but two of Germany’s most widely read news media published comprehensive skeptical climate science articles in their print and online editions, coinciding with the release of a major climate skeptical book, Die kalte Sonne (The Cold Sun)…. “

Bob Carter In THE AUSTRALIAN
Scientific research drowning in a sea of alarmism
February 07, 201212:00AM
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=Scientific+research+drowning+in+a+sea+of+alarmism+&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDgQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fopinion%2Fscientific-research-drowning-in-a-sea-of-alarmism%2Fstory-e6frgd0x-1226264130114&ei=5tIyT-3iHMKXiAfc4aHzBA&usg=AFQjCNGuK425ouxPY0-a5RsEyziXO8poUQ&sig2=775AxKC41zq-4FFjPBwv7A

” …And, fourth, that the Sydney tide gauge, as well as other long tidal records from nearby (Fremantle, Auckland) and overseas, exhibits a slowing rate of sea-level rise over the past 40 years.

All of which leads directly to the three following money questions. Why do Australian governments still draw their advice about sea-level change from the IPCC, a discredited international political agency that is now known to flout conventional scientific and peer-review procedures in favour of promulgating environmental activism?

Why have governments adopted the irrational policy of basing Australian sea-level planning on theoretical computer-generated projections of global sea-level change?

Last, why do Australian authorities ignore the solid base of empirical measurements, and the more than 100 years of peer-reviewed local and international research, that contradicts completely the alarmist views of the IPCC; and that also provides the accurate, site-specific records of local sea-level change that are the necessary basis for achieving sensible coastal policies in Australia?

The good folk who live around Lake Macquarie, and doubtless tens of thousands of other coastal residents upon whom new planning regulations are now impinging, deserve an explanation; and it needs to be a good one.”