Posted by: Grant | March 22, 2015

Global Governance – The Threat

commissarThe most alarming thing about the putsch for global governance at the U.N. to save-da-planet is that it is Stalinism designed make the “Masses” suffer so they will revolt against their capitalist masters.

Why alarming?
The putsch is designed to make the fundamental basis of our prosperous modern society, our energy system, dysfunctional.

You can put up windmills and solar panels and install a huge battery bank and try to grow your own biodiesel on your remote hobby farm, but you cannot apply that globally.
It cannot be scaled up to replace a system that took three generations and trillions of dollars to build. (see sidebar)
You cannot store gigawatts of power in lead acid batteries.
There is no such thing as “Alternative” power because there is no way of storing it. Coal oil and gas are vast reservoirs of stored energy.
“Renewable” energy is so dilute and dispersed that you will cause significant environmental problems just trying to collect enough of it.
Trying to store the dilute and dispersed energy from “Renewable” power “farms” adds an order of magnitude more cost.
Like the Carnot Cycle, that order of magnitude cost is intrinsic. You use energy storing energy and you lose energy retrieving it.
Also, the means of storing “Renewables” it is still all theoretical. It has not been demonstrated on a large-scale. Limited experimental success has not been touted because the cost of the power produced can only be described as astronomical with no obvious way of improving the intrinsic, inherent, storage losses.

Then there is biofuel. Trying to run the global fleet of ships, trucks, trains and aeroplanes on vast monoculture plantations would be an environmental disaster, vulnerable to pest and plague.

So what is the harm in trying to be Green?
Simple.

ONE   They do not know what they are doing. They are FORCING implementation of unproven energy systems in the vain hope that they can be made to work.

TWO   We have a highly efficient, well-developed, non-polluting and cheap system of power generation and supply. The efficacy of that well-oiled system is disrupted when it is forced to sit and idle, waiting for the wind to die down and the clouds to clear.

THREE   We finish up with very expensive “renewable power”  which has to be backed up 100% by regular power which has been made very expensive by forcing it to remain idling on standby for extended periods.

FOUR   Proponents are inherently anti-human, they treat humanity as a disease despoiling the planet. Their misanthropy is manifested by their rejection of the one demonstrated successful solution, Nuclear Power.

Here is what I mean by “FORCING” unproven energy systems -

THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The Coming Climate Court
The proposed Paris agreement is another reach for global power
By Chris Horner – Sunday, March 8, 2015 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/8/chris-horner-paris-climate-agreement-a-global-powe/

” …This text agreed to for negotiation by the federal government includes a remarkable proposal. Buried deep inside, it proposes an “International Climate Justice Tribunal in order to oversee, control and sanction the fulfilment [sic] of and compliance with the obligations of Annex I and Annex II Parties under this agreement and the [1992 UNFCCC climate treaty]…”

cartoon-11105

Posted by: Grant | March 8, 2015

How Climate Change Ends

It just fades away.

It is the manifestation of the old joke – “everybody complains about the weather but nobody does anything about it”.

The public are bored with it because it has degenerated into a political impasse with no obvious problem and no obvious solution.

“Projections” you can bank onThis report from BP shows that the wealthy bourgeois trendy intellectual greenies are having absolutely zero effect on global fossil fuel output.

BP ENERGY OUTLOOK 2035
http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/energy-outlook-2015/Energy_Outlook_2035_booklet.pdf consumption

Posted by: Grant | March 8, 2015

Whole CSIRO Board To Go

There is a Green culture infesting the scientific community.
Scientists trying to earn a stable living would be well advised to stay out of the politics, be objective and produce results. They should resist the temptation of creating dramatic scenarios in the media to attract public funding.

endangered

WUWT
Change you can believe in! Aussie government ditches the entire board of the CSIRO
Anthony Watts / 23 hours ago March 6, 2015 
Does not rehire any previous board level appointees
Story submitted by Eric Worrall http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/06/change-you-can-believe-in-aussie-government-ditches-the-entire-board-of-the-csiro/

NOW – for the ABC -

Posted by: Grant | February 28, 2015

Sea World LIES

Having no shame about the hundreds of tonnes of greenhouse gases that they produce themselves by refrigerating a large outdoor pool to keep bears in a subtropical climate, or ignoring the simple fact that Polar Bear numbers have rebounded and are very healthy, or that despite the fact that astronomical global greenhouse gas output has produced no significant temperature rise yet, the Aussie Sea World have celebrated Polar Bear Day by claiming on Channel Nine that they are endangered . http://youtu.be/KR90M8AL5_s

The claim that there is a “dramatic decline in numbers in the wild” is a BLATANT LIE

Threatened? 
They are also threatened by an asteroid strike, which at present seems just as likely as human fossil fuel burning causing the planet to overheat, and the bears not being able to adapt to it.
Melting sea ice is obviously not going to threaten the whole species even if it does start melting and a few of them accidently drown.

This website contains huge amount of science from 35 years of research -

cropped-header-draft-final-narrow3http://polarbearscience.com/

UK TELEGRAPH
Sir David Attenborough should check his facts on polar bears
Sir David was wrong to join the chorus on global warming
By  Christopher Booker
3:22PM GMT 16 Mar 2013 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/9934109/Sir-David-Attenborough-should-check-his-facts-on-polar-bears.html

NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO
The Inconvenient Truth About Polar Bears
February 02, 2013 2:36 PM ET http://www.npr.org/2013/02/02/170779528/the-inconvenient-truth-about-polar-bears?ft=1&f=1025 http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=170779528&m=170947367

IBT
Alaska Says Climate Change is no Threat to Polar Bears, Opposes Protection
By  Amrutha Gayathri on August 30 2011 1:30 AM EDT http://www.ibtimes.com/alaska-says-climate-change-no-threat-polar-bears-opposes-protection-306532

FINANCIAL POST
Faux polar bear figures
Susan Crockford, Special to Financial Post | January 15, 2015 9:41 AM ET http://business.financialpost.com/2015/01/15/faux-polar-bear-figures/

Scientific Papers
Polar bears of western Hudson Bay and climate change: Are warming spring air temperatures the “ultimate” survival control factor? (PDF)
(Ecological Complexity, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp. 73-84, September 2007)
- M. G. Dyck, W. Soon, R. K. Baydack, D. R. Legates, S. Baliunas, T. F. Ball, L. O. Hancock http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.002

Reply to response to Dyck et al. (2007) on polar bears and climate change in western Hudson Bay by Stirling et al. (2008) (PDF)
(Ecological Complexity, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 289-302, December 2008)
- M. G. Dyck, W. Soon, R. K. Baydack, D. R. Legates, S. Baliunas, T. F. Ball, L. O. Hancock http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.05.004

Polar Bear Population Forecasts: A Public-Policy Forecasting Audit (PDF)
(Interfaces, Volume 38, Number 5, pp. 382-405, September-October 2008)
- J. Scott Armstrong, Kesten C. Green, Willie H. Soon http://interfaces.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/5/382

Nuclear Genomic Sequences Reveal that Polar Bears Are an Old and Distinct Bear Lineage
(Science 20, Volume 336, Number 6079, pp. 344-347, April 2012)
- Frank Hailer et al. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6079/344.short

Population ecology of polar bears in Davis Strait, Canada and Greenland
(The Journal of Wildlife Management, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp. 463-476, April 2013)
- Elizabeth Peacock, Mitchell K. Taylor, Jeffrey Laake, Ian Stirling http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.489/abstract

 

Posted by: Grant | February 27, 2015

Cartoonist Rick McKee – Augusta Chronicle

We in aussie get the usual superstitious bullcrap every time we get a summer heat wave so I have to resist the hypocrisy of pointing out that the record cold winters we are seeing in the northern hemisphere lately are consistent with the lack of sunspot activity seen in the Maunder Minimum/Little Ice Age.

I just thought this was amusing, that’s all.

mckee-gw-snow

Posted by: Grant | February 27, 2015

UNIPCC Head Resigns

imagesBBC INDIA
24 February 2015 Last updated at 13:31 
UN climate head Rajendra Pachauri resigns http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-31601122

While other deniers are dancing, I am sorry to see him go.
I hope the UNIPCC don’t replace him with someone with talent and charisma.

Posted by: Grant | February 22, 2015

Global Governance

Here is some support for my contention on the sidebar of this blog that “Climate” is a massive plot to institute global governance by Leftists via the UN.

WUWT
The UN Climate End Game
Anthony Watts / 3 days ago February 18, 2015 
Guest opinion by David Archibald http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/18/the-un-climate-end-game/

g“Everybody Wants To Rule The World” was a 1985 song by Tears For Fears. Now in 2015, a number of parties are doing their best to that end – ISIS in the Middle East, Russia chewing up the Ukraine, China in the East and South China Seas and the UN Climate Change Commission. A draft document out of Geneva gives details of the UN plan to rule the world.

ISIS, Putin, China et. al. are already constrained by international pressures, especially economic, this makes the threat of global governance a real worry. It is a worry because it is essentially anti-human.

Posted by: Grant | February 22, 2015

Perspective On Modelling.

A computer model is just a model. It does not predict anything. It just models what might happen. It is purely specious to gather like minded models and present them as credible prediction. You can average data and get a useful result, if you average models you just get another model.

This expert delivers an expose’ on UNIPCC claims which are based on modelling.
Of course, this doesn’t matter, incorrect claims are just shrugged off. “Climate Change” is a belief system and disbelievers are “deniers”.
You can watch the lecture here - http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/20/believing-in-six-impossible-things-before-breakfast-and-climate-models/if you want some science.

I just liked these images that he uses – this one shows the global temperature on the full range of temperature found on the planet. You will need to click on it to notice the tiny variations.
1988 was when it started warming, 1998 was when it stopped warming and 2014 was supposed to be the “hottest year ever”.
real temperature hotest yr

 

and this is why the UNIPCC climate models cannot be predictive and are just illustrative of their doomsday theory.

“…The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible…”
So states the IPCC’s Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, Third Assessment Report (TAR), Chapter 14 (final para., 14.2.2.2), p774.
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/501.htm ipcc-models-predict-future
full paragraph -
” Further work is needed in eight broad areas:-
• Improve methods to quantify uncertainties of climate projections and scenarios, including development and exploration of long-term ensemble simulations using complex models. The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. Rather the focus must be upon the prediction of the probability distribution of the system�s future possible states by the generation of ensembles of model solutions. Addressing adequately the statistical nature of climate is computationally intensive and requires the application of new methods of model diagnosis, but such statistical information is essential.”

Posted by: Grant | February 10, 2015

Warmest Year In History – WRONG

It would be quite simple for our news media to pick up the phone and get a balancing comment when Climate Change claims are made.
There are any number of very qualified sceptics around.

In all the years I have been blogging I have NEVER seen that happen.
Here is a belated rebuttal to the recent global “hottest year on record” claims.

Capture-1
BOSTON GLOBE

No, 2014 wasn’t the ‘warmest year in history’
AP/file 2014
By Jeff Jacoby Globe Columnist  January 29, 2015 http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/01/29/global-temperature-what-does-that-even-mean/YBuZQuXqAB5dJYznrRyVKI/story.html

” …All of which reasonably leads to the conclusion not that the planet has been relentlessly warming, but that the warming trend that peaked at the end of the 1990s has neither resumed nor reversed. Global warming has more or less been on hold since the turn of the 21st century. That hiatus poses something of an inconvenient truth to those who believe that anthropogenic carbon-dioxide is the key driver of climate change, since CO2 emissions have continued without letup.
         
You don’t have to be a scientist to realize that climate is complicated and hard to get right. Climate models have so far been unable to accurately predict changes in global temperature. Experts didn’t foresee the global cooling that began in the 1940s and didn’t anticipate the warming cycle that started in the late 1970s. Climate science is still in its infancy, and it would be folly to treat any single explanation for changes in global temperatures as impervious to challenge or skepticism…. “

Posted by: Grant | February 2, 2015

Causes-all-the-bad-weather Theory.

The Earth’s temperature is not static, it constantly changes from a relatively warm period to a relatively cool period.
We have had a roman warm period, a medieval warm period, a little ice age, and even a global cooling scare in the nineteen seventies.

It is axiomatic that global temperature changes.
It is axiomatic that climate changes.
It is axiomatic that when global temperature changes, climate changes.

To claim that Global Warming will cause serious Climate Change is dogmatic.

It is dogmatic because the Green philosophy contends that the Earth without humans is perfect and static and that anything that humans do to it spoils it badly. They treat humanity as a virus infecting the natural environment.
That is why human Global Warming is always bad, never good.
The Vikings named a large island Greenland and their colonies prospered there for a long while, today that would be classified as the evil destruction of a pristine habitat for pengiuns, seals and big cuddly white polar bears.

If you are seeking definitive science, or even some kind of explanation, on why a warming of the globe causes seriously bad weather you will not find it in any of the reports put out by the UN IPCC.

This interesting scientific paper attempts to predict what effect global warming would have on atmospheric turbulence.

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
Faculty of Arts and Science
January 29, 2015
By: Sean Bettam
Atmosphere will adapt to hotter, wetter climate http://news.artsci.utoronto.ca/all-news/global-warming-wont-mean-stormy-weather/

Paper here -
Science 30 January 2015:
 Vol. 347  no. 6221  pp. 540-543 
 DOI: 10.1126/science.1257103 
Constrained work output of the moist atmospheric heat engine in a warming climate https://www.sciencemag.org/content/347/6221/540.abstract
thumbJoni Mitchell – Both Sides, Now

I think what they are trying to say is that the global temperature is remarkably stable and self-regulating.

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 158 other followers