Posted by: Grant | October 3, 2011

Submission to the Inquiry into Carbon Tax Pricing Mechanisms

JO NOVA BLOG
Dr David Evans: Four fatal pieces of evidence
http://joannenova.com.au/2011/09/dr-david-evans-four-fatal-pieces-of-evidence/#more-17260

Dr David Evans lays out four crucial pieces of evidence, and calls for a debate with Prof Andrew Pitman. But the evidence is so unarguably strong for skeptics, we know that the name-calling-team-who-want-our-money will do anything to avoid a public debate. If the evidence is “overwhelming” why are they so unwilling to explain it?  — Jo

“First,  they have a track record of greatly exaggerating temperature increases…. “

“Second, the climate models predict the oceans should be warming…. “

http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/ocean/argo-ocean-heat.gif

“Third, the climate models predict a particular pattern of atmospheric warming during periods of global warming…. “

“Fourth, satellites have measured the outgoing radiation from the earth and found that the earth gives off more heat when the surface is warmer, and less heat in months when the earth’s surface is cooler. Who could have guessed? But the climate models say the opposite, that the Earth gives off less heat when the surface is warmer, because they trap heat too aggressively (positive feedback). Again, the climate models are violently at odds with reality… “

Find the PDF Here…

Submission to the Inquiry into Carbon Tax Pricing Mechanisms
Dr David Evans
20 September 2011
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDwQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencespeak.com%2Fsubmission.pdf&ei=EbGITv3GAYaaiQeVreWiDw&usg=AFQjCNE1uoOpQ0X1B2zotIFyv7I8zrfvcQ&sig2=wa1ln1kepGzyywdzERXqpA

“Dr David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005, and part-time to the Department of Climate Change from 2008 to 2010, modeling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. Evans is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University…. “

” ….There is something very religious and medieval about all of this. Galileo’s case led to the Enlightenment, in which evidence came to triumph over political authority. In enlightened society, people did not have to believe something just because some political or religious authority said it is so – the evidence determines what is considered true.

But on climate, our society is reversing the Enlightenment, slipping back towards the middle ages. Sure we have smart phones, but our means of determining truth has reverted to political authorities and their pet scientists declaring what is true, denying the evidence, and reviling the unbelievers.
It get worse. Not only we reversing the values of the Enlightenment, we are de-industrializing. These scam artists, led by those technological buffoons the Greens, want us to close down our cheap and reliable sources of power and go back to using unreliable and intermittent windmills. Like in the middle ages, we would be at the mercy of the breeze, using muscle power where possible. These people pride themselves on being “progressive”, which, like everything else on this topic, is a fully sick parody of the truth.

This corruption has to end. We have repeatedly called for a Royal Commission into the science before taking action, but were of course ignored.
So now I am calling for a debate…. “

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: